Hey guys! Justy wanted to chime in here and answer any questions about this build. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif. It was not easy to get that response considering we were required to stay below 3.5 cubes, but all in all I hope it worked out well, and as far as it having two resonances, that is incorrect, and the octave band is around a full octave, which is not bad for a BP design. The goal we had was an SQL to play around the 20-60Hz range, and the first idea was to utilize a 4th order, but I found that this design style worked a bit better than that as far as output in the lower region. The design was goaled for an in trunk install, BUT the point of interest on the location of the port was to be facing the cabin, which may or may not have been mentioned lol. But all in all, the resonances in the upper range can very well be fixed by sealing it off, though a lot of this has to do with the end of band operation froma lower tuning and trying to control the phase within a small dimensional space given that quasi 6th orders can require a lot of room. All in all, I stuck with a BP design by request of the customer and though a conventional ported box would have worked very well also, the idea was to crush the lows in this case, with high efficiency, and the way to go with that while keeping control of the driver is with a BP.
That all being said, Im glad that an honest review was done and I am glad that the enclosure came out well! The muddiness mentioned can be tweaked obviously by cutoff points and possibly positioning as the response information was based on a single position alone, so please @Murph keep me updated on that and thanks @keep_hope_alive for the help on that as well! If you have any questions, please let me know //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif.